California Observer

Latino Health Equality: A Path to a Healthier California

Latino Health Equality A Path to a Healthier California
Photo Courtesy: Walter Contreras

By: Walter Contreras

California is celebrated for its diverse population, beautiful weather, and coastline—only five other states can boast a similarly varied demographic landscape. At 40%, Latinos are the largest ethnic group in California, and addressing health disparities is vital for supporting all communities within the state. Access to high-quality healthcare is essential for all Californians to live long, healthy lives. However, various challenges impact healthcare access and outcomes for Latinos, leading to an opportunity for targeted improvements in health services and community support.

For example, despite being the largest ethnic/racial group in California, only 6% of the state’s doctors and 8% of the state’s medical school graduates are Latino. This gap can lead to language and cultural barriers, which may impact patient-provider communication and understanding of medical advice.

California also needs more affordable housing, which often affects urban, low-income areas with limited resources such as healthy food options. These so-called food deserts contribute to shorter life expectancies and associated health concerns. According to a 2020 National Institute’s for Health study, individuals in poverty experience significantly lower life expectancy rates—an ongoing issue that warrants attention.

Environmental factors also play a role in the health landscape. Research from UC San Diego’s School of Global Policy and Strategy indicates that some communities in California experience more air pollution due to nearby economic activity, which is associated with increased rates of respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses.

Water quality presents another critical challenge. Although California’s laws statutorily recognize the right to safe, clean, and accessible water, nearly 400 water systems in the state are at risk of failing new, stringent testing requirements. Some communities, including areas in East Los Angeles, face heightened concerns around water quality issues, such as the presence of “forever chemicals” like PFAS, which are under scrutiny for their potential health impacts.

Additionally, research from the University of California Santa Barbara found that community water systems serving certain areas often show elevated levels of pollutants, including arsenic and nitrate. This contamination, often driven by agricultural activities, can pose health risks, particularly during drought conditions, as noted by UCSB researchers who warned of potential impacts on health outcomes in these regions.

While California emphasizes environmental protection, opportunities remain to ensure that all communities benefit equitably. For example, proposed bans on bottled water products in localities could remove an important source of clean drinking water for residents in areas facing compromised water quality. Ensuring that policy decisions balance environmental goals with community health needs is essential.

California’s future depends on supporting a healthy, inclusive state where all residents, regardless of background, have equitable access to resources that enable healthy living. By highlighting existing challenges and opportunities for improvement, California can foster a more equitable healthcare landscape that benefits everyone.

About the Author

Walter Contreras heads the Sperantia Foundation, a Southern California-based organization focused on food and water access equality, social development, and environmental stewardship. Driven by community transformation, Walter is also a Faith Root Organizer for Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice (CLUE). He is also a board member of Californians for Smarter Sustainability (CASS), which seeks to balance California’s economic prosperity and quality of life alongside environmental protection.

Published by: Martin De Juan

(Ambassador)

This article features branded content from a third party. Opinions in this article do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of California Observer.