California Observer

Three Kinds of Wealth, and Only One of Them Shows Up on a Tax Return

Three Kinds of Wealth, and Only One of Them Shows Up on a Tax Return
Photo Courtesy: Todd Villarrubia

By: Dr. Tamara Patzer

In brief: A New Orleans tax attorney’s book describes three forms of wealth: financial, intellectual and social capital. Only the first is counted by the IRS-based income lines, such as California’s estimated $987,325 for the top 1%. This feature looks at what the other two are, why they matter to a family’s legacy and how owners can protect them.

Rankings of the wealthy count one thing: money. A 2026 projection sets the adjusted gross income needed to reach the top 1% of California filers at $987,3251, and the Federal Reserve’s newest family survey, released October 9, 2026, reports a median net worth of $215,900 and a mean of $1.24 million3. Both are measures of financial capital. New Orleans attorney Todd M. Villarrubia, whose book is Entrepreneurial B.E.A.S.T. Mode™, argues that a legacy has two other parts, and that families who ignore them tend to lose the first.

What are the three forms of wealth?

The book defines them in a short list. Financial capital covers tangible assets, investments and business equity. Intellectual capital is the lessons, experience and wisdom an owner has gained. Social capital is the reputation, relationships and community impact an owner leaves behind.

It then draws a conclusion: “Combined, these three forms of wealth create a cohesive framework for generational success.” The idea is that a family with money and no wisdom, or money and no relationships, has a weaker legacy than its balance sheet suggests.

Why does the book put money first and then move on?

Because the money is the part with rules attached. Income lines, estate exclusions and entity choices all concern financial capital, and they need attention. But the book’s point is that attention to money alone is not enough. A family can have a flawless set of documents and still end in a dispute.

Villarrubia is blunt about the limits of paper: “But estate documents don’t prevent family disputes; they merely provide something to fight over.” The documents allocate assets. They do not teach anyone why the assets exist or how to manage them.

What is intellectual capital in practice?

It is what the founder knows and the family has not yet learned. How the company makes decisions. Why certain risks were taken and others avoided. Which advisers were trusted and why. How the founder thinks about spending, giving and debt.

In the book’s framing, passing on this knowledge matters as much as passing on assets. In Villarrubia’s words, “Protect the wealth and the wisdom, because if you don’t pass on the wisdom, the wealth won’t last.” Families that treat wisdom as optional often discover its value too late.

A practical version is simple. The founder writes down the principles they use to make big decisions, shares them in stages and invites questions. The exercise takes hours and can shape decades.

What is social capital in practice?

It is the family’s reputation and relationships, including those with the community, employees, customers and the advisers who know the family. It also includes the family’s name in the places where it does business.

Social capital is slow to build and fast to lose. A public dispute among heirs or a mishandled sale can damage it in a season. That is one reason the book treats family governance as part of wealth and not a side issue.

The book’s closing thought on the topic is about continuity, not control: “It’s not about creating carbon copies of yourself, but about ensuring continuity of values in a changing world.”

How much is at stake?

A large amount, by one estimate. Cerulli Associates expects $124 trillion to move between U.S. generations through 2048, split between heirs ($105 trillion) and charity ($18 trillion)2. Some of it will move through California families, though the source does not break the figure out by state.

Most of that will be financial capital changing hands. The question for each family is how much of the other two will go with it.

What can a family do about the other two?

Small actions, taken early:

  • Hold a family meeting on purpose, not just on holidays, and write down what was decided.
  • Have the founder record how and why they made their major decisions.
  • Introduce heirs to the family’s advisers and to the community the family supports.
  • Decide how the family wants to be known and what it will not do.
  • Put the plan in writing, and set a date to revisit it.

The book keeps returning to purpose. As it puts it, “The greatest risk to wealth isn’t taxes or markets, but forgetting why the plan exists.”

How do the three forms of wealth interact?

They support or undermine each other. A family with strong intellectual capital makes better financial decisions. A family with strong social capital finds better advisers, partners and opportunities. A family with a large balance sheet and neither can spend it down faster than it expects. The book treats the three as one system, so its planning advice reaches beyond the legal documents.

The reverse is also true. A family whose finances are in disorder will find its wisdom and reputation under pressure, since disputes over money tend to consume everything else.

A family can test itself with one question: if the money disappeared tomorrow, what would remain? The answer is its intellectual and social capital, and it is a fair measure of how much of the legacy was ever about the money.

How can an owner measure the three kinds?

Keep it rough. Rate each kind on a scale of one to five: how healthy is the financial side, how strong is the human side, how clear is the legacy side. Do it alone, then ask a spouse or a trusted adviser to rate you. The differences between the two sets of scores are often more useful than the scores themselves. They show where the owner’s view and others’ views diverge, which is where a conversation can start.

Common questions

Is this about philosophy or planning? Both. The book treats these as practical parts of a plan, alongside the legal and tax work.

Does a family need to be wealthy for this to matter? No. The three forms of wealth exist at every level. The book notes that “With foresight, even modest wealth can compound into enduring strength.”

Where should a family start? With a conversation, then with a licensed attorney and a tax professional to put the legal pieces in place.

Sources

  1. SmartAsset, Income Needed to Be in the Top 1% in Every State (2026)
  2. NAPA-Net, Wealth Transfers Expected to Hit $124 Trillion Through 2048 (reporting Cerulli)
  3. Federal Reserve Board, press release on the 2025 Survey of Consumer Finances

About the author. Dr. Tamara Patzer is a publisher and former newspaper editor. She was on the staff of The Charlotte Sun when it was named a 2005 Pulitzer Prize finalist for its Hurricane Charley coverage.

About the source. Todd M. Villarrubia is an attorney with an LL.M. in Taxation and a Juris Doctorate. He is an Accredited Estate Planner, a Board Certified Expert in Estate Planning and Administration, and a Fiduciary Investment Advisor Representative. He is the author of Entrepreneurial B.E.A.S.T. Mode™. Wealth Planning Law Group, 101 W. Robert E. Lee Blvd., Ste 404, New Orleans, LA 70124. Phone: 504-982-8207; email: todd@lawealthplan.com; website: https://lawealthplan.com/?utm_source=newsanchored&utm_medium=california-observer&utm_campaign=top-1pct

Disclaimer: Sponsored feature written on behalf of Todd M. Villarrubia. This article is general information, not legal or tax advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Results vary.

California Observer

This article features branded content from a third party. Opinions in this article do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of California Observer.